Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Stigma and Conspiracy Beliefs Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Interest in Using PrEP Among Black and White Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The HIV/AIDS epidemic in the US continues to persist, in particular, among race, sexual orientation, and gender minority populations. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), or using antiretroviral medications for HIV prevention, is an effective option, but uptake of PrEP has been slow. Sociocultural barriers to using PrEP have been largely underemphasized, yet have the potential to stall uptake and, therefore, warrant further understanding. In order to assess the relationships between potential barriers to PrEP (i.e., PrEP stigma and conspiracy beliefs), and interest in PrEP, Black men and transgender women who have sex with men (BMTW, N = 85) and White MTW (WMTW, N = 179) were surveyed at a gay pride event in 2015 in a large southeastern US city. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were completed to examine factors associated with PrEP interest. Among the full sample, moderate levels of PrEP awareness (63%) and low levels of use (9%) were observed. Believing that PrEP is for people who are promiscuous (stigma belief) was strongly associated with lack of interest in using PrEP, and individuals who endorsed this belief were more likely to report sexual risk taking behavior. Conspiracy beliefs related to PrEP were reported among a large minority of the sample (42%) and were more frequently reported among BMTW than WMTW. Given the strong emphasis on the use of biomedical strategies for HIV prevention, addressing sociocultural barriers to PrEP access is urgently needed and failure to do so will weaken the potential benefits of biomedical prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NHAS. National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States: Updated 2020: https://www.aids.gov/federal-resources/national-hiv-aids-strategy/overview/. 2015.

  2. Purcell DW, Johnson CH, Lansky A, Prejean J, Stein R, Denning P, et al. Estimating the population size of men who have sex with men in the United States to obtain HIV and syphilis rates. Open AIDS J. 2012;6:98–107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Matthews DD, Herrick AL, Coulter RW, Friedman MR, Mills TC, Eaton LA, et al. Running backwards: consequences of current HIV incidence rates for the next generation of black MSM in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2015. doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1158-z.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N. Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McCormack S, Dunn DT, Desai M, Dolling DI, Gafos M, Gilson R, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):53–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Goedel WC, Halkitis PN, Greene RE, Hickson DA, Duncan DT. HIV risk behaviors, perceptions, and testing and preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness/use in grindr-using men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Georgia. JANAC. 2016;27(2):133–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dolezal C, Frasca T, Giguere R, Ibitoye M, Cranston RD, Febo I, et al. Awareness of post-exposure prophylaxis (pep) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is low but interest is high among men engaging in condomless anal sex with men in Boston, Pittsburgh, and San Juan. AIDS Educa Prev. 2015;27(4):289–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Bauermeister J, Smith H, Conway-Washington C. Minimal awareness and stalled uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among at risk, HIV-negative, black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2015;29(8):423–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith DK, Van Handel M, Wolitski RJ, Stryker JE, Hall HI, Prejean J, et al. Vital signs: estimated percentages and numbers of adults with indications for preexposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV acquisition—United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(46):1291–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer KH, Hosek S, Cohen S, Liu A, Pickett J, Warren M, et al. Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation in the United States: a work in progress. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(4 Suppl 3):19980.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Auerbach JD, Hoppe TA. Beyond “getting drugs into bodies”: social science perspectives on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(4 Suppl 3):19983.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Haire BG. Preexposure prophylaxis-related stigma: strategies to improve uptake and adherence—a narrative review. HIV/Aids. 2015;7:241–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Calabrese SK, Underhill K. How stigma surrounding the use of hiv preexposure prophylaxis undermines prevention and pleasure: a call to destigmatize “Truvada Whores”. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(10):1960–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Oldenburg CE, Mitty JA, Biello KB, Closson EF, Safren SA, Mayer KH, et al. Differences in attitudes about HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among stimulant versus alcohol using men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2015. doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1226-4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Duran D. Truvada whores? Huffintong Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-duran/truvada-whores_b_2113588.html. 2012.

  16. Crary D. Truvada, HIV prevention drug, divides gay community. Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/07/truvada-gay-men-hiv_n_5102515.html. 2014.

  17. Stigma EG. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Earnshaw VA, Chaudoir SR. From conceptualizing to measuring HIV stigma: a review of HIV stigma mechanism measures. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(6):1160–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Herek GM. AIDS and stigma. Am Behav Sci. 1999;42:1106–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Underhill K, Morrow KM, Colleran C, Holcomb R, Calabrese SK, Operario D, et al. A qualitative study of medical mistrust, perceived discrimination, and risk behavior disclosure to clinicians by US male sex workers and other men who have sex with men: implications for biomedical HIV prevention. J Urban Health. 2015;92(4):667–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Kegler C, Smith H, Conway-Washington C, White D, et al. The role of stigma and medical mistrust in the routine health care engagement of black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(2):e75–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Maulsby C, Millett G, Lindsey K, Kelley R, Johnson K, Montoya D, et al. HIV among black men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States: a review of the literature. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(1):10–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bogart LM, Wagner G, Galvan FH, Banks D. Conspiracy beliefs about HIV are related to antiretroviral treatment nonadherence among african american men with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53(5):648–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bogart LM, Thorburn S. Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs a barrier to HIV prevention among African Americans? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(2):213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Smith H, Conway-Washington C, White D, Cherry C. Psychosocial factors related to willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among Black men who have sex with men attending a community event. Sexual Health. 2014;11(3):244–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen SE, Vittinghoff E, Bacon O, Doblecki-Lewis S, Postle BS, Feaster DJ, et al. High interest in preexposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men at risk for HIV infection: baseline data from the US PrEP demonstration project. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68(4):439–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Krakower D, Ware N, Mitty JA, Maloney K, Mayer KH. HIV providers’ perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis in care settings: a qualitative study. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1712–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Calabrese SK, Earnshaw VA, Underhill K, Hansen NB, Dovidio JF. The impact of patient race on clinical decisions related to prescribing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): assumptions about sexual risk compensation and implications for access. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):226–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Grov C, Whitfield TH, Rendina HJ, Ventuneac A, Parsons JT. Willingness to take PrEP and potential for risk compensation among highly sexually active gay and bisexual men. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(12):2234–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Blumenthal J, Haubrich RH. Will risk compensation accompany pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV? Virtual Mentor: VM. 2014;16(11):909–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Volk JE, Marcus JL, Phengrasamy T, Blechinger D, Nguyen DP, Follansbee S, et al. No new HIV infections with increasing use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in a clinical practice setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(10):1601–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Adams L, Balderson B, Packett B II, Brown K, Catz S. Providers’ perspectives on prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention. HIV Spec. 2015;7(1):18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sullivan PS, Salazar L, Buchbinder S, Sanchez TH. Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS. 2009;23(9):1153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gamarel KE, Golub SA. Intimacy motivations and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adoption intentions among HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) in romantic relationships. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49(2):177–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Brooks RA, Kaplan RL, Lieber E, Landovitz RJ, Lee SJ, Leibowitz AA. Motivators, concerns, and barriers to adoption of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men in HIV-serodiscordant male relationships. AIDS Care. 2011;23(9):1136–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Calabrese SK, Underhill K, Earnshaw VA, Hansen NB, Kershaw TS, Magnus M, et al. Framing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for the general public: how inclusive messaging may prevent prejudice from diminishing public support. AIDS Behav. 2016. doi:10.1007/s10461-016-1318-9.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Davis T, Zanjani F. Prevention of HIV among older adults: a literature review and recommendations for future research. J Aging Health. 2012;24(8):1399–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Matthews DD, Herrick AL, Coulter RW, Friedman MR, Mills TC, Eaton LA, et al. Running backwards: consequences of current HIV incidence rates for the next generation of black MSM in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(1):7–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hutchinson AB, Begley EB, Sullivan P, Clark HA, Boyett BC, Kellerman SE. Conspiracy beliefs and trust in information about HIV/AIDS among minority men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45(5):603–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gillman J, Davila J, Sansgiry S, Parkinson-Windross D, Miertschin N, Mitts B, et al. The effect of conspiracy beliefs and trust on HIV diagnosis, linkage, and retention in young MSM with HIV. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013;24(1):36–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by National Institutes of Health Grants R01MH094230, R01NR013865, T32MH074387, and R01DA033067.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Development and Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

    Lisa A. Eaton & Jessica Maksut

  2. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

    Seth C. Kalichman, Devon Price, Stephanie Finneran & Aerielle Allen

Authors
  1. Lisa A. Eaton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seth C. Kalichman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Devon Price
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stephanie Finneran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aerielle Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jessica Maksut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa A. Eaton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eaton, L.A., Kalichman, S.C., Price, D. et al. Stigma and Conspiracy Beliefs Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Interest in Using PrEP Among Black and White Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men. AIDS Behav 21, 1236–1246 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1690-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1690-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation