Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How do students offer value to organisations through work integrated learning? A qualitative study using Social Exchange Theory

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning through work is a common feature of preparing health professionals for practice. Current understandings of work-integrated learning or a ‘work-based placement’, focus on students being consumers of experiences rather than providing a reciprocal benefit to the organisation in which they are placed. More nuanced understanding of the ways that students can offer value to organisations may provide new opportunities and increased capacity for workplace learning. This study drew on Social Exchange Theory to explore the perceived value and benefits of work-integrated learning experiences to the organisations in which students are placed. The focus was on population health placements undertaken by dietetics students at a large Australian university. An interpretive approach was employed with interviews with placement educators and document analysis of student-generated products from their placement. Seventeen of 20 eligible placement educators were interviewed, with interview data coded using thematic framework analysis. These data were supported with document analysis of student scientific posters completed as part of assessment to develop themes which were interpreted with social exchange theory. Three themes were identified: (1) students add to the organisation’s capacity, (2) benefits outweigh time cost of planning and supervising and (3) explicitly valuing students for their contributions may build trust and further potentiate bi-directional benefits. Results suggest that student placements can add value to organisations. This reciprocity of benefits should be communicated to all stakeholders involved in the university-community collaboration, including students. Social exchange theory sensitised researchers to nuanced findings that may support the translation of these study findings to other student work-integrated learning settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ash, S., Martin, E. K., Rodger, S., Clark, M., & Graves, N. (2015). Student and supervisor productivity change during nutrition and dietetic practice placements: A cohort study. Nutrition & Dietetics, 72(2), 163–169. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). How much does Australia spend on health care? In A. Government (Ed.), Australia’s Health 2018. Australian Government.

  • Billett, S. (2016). Learning through health care work: premises, contributions and practices. Medical Education, 50(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, E., Short, K., McAllister, L., & Nagarajan, S. (2019). The quantitative impact of placements on allied health time use and productivity in healthcare facilities: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Focus On Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal, 20(2), 8–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K., Cheshire, C., Rice, E., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. In Handbook of social psychology (pp. 61–88). Springer.

  • Crampton, P. E. S., McLachlan, J. C., & Illing, J. C. (2013). A systematic literature review of undergraduate clinical placements in underserved areas. Medical Education, 47(10), 969–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dharamsi, S., Espinoza, N., Cramer, C., Amin, M., Bainbridge, L., et al. (2010). Nurturing social responsibility through community service-learning: Lessons learned from a pilot project. Medical Teacher, 32(11), 905–911. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903434169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietitians Association of Australia. (2017). Accreditation Standards for Dietetics Education Programs version 2.0. Deakin, ACT.

  • Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 117–117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauer, K., Oza, S., Kogan, J., Stankiewicz, C., Stenfors-Hayes, T., et al. (2015). How clinical supervisors develop trust in their trainees: A qualitative study. Medical Education, 49(8), 783–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R. B. (2013). Utilisation of the healthcare system for authentic early experience placements. Rural and Remote Health, 13(2), 2328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R., Begley, A., & Yeatman, H. (2016). Consensus on the core functions of the public health nutrition workforce in Australia. Nutrition & Dietetics, 73(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R., & Margetts, B. (2011). Practical public health nutrition. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J., Bonham, C., & Jones, L. (2011). Understanding the goals of service learning and community-based medical education: A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 86(2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182046481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, E., Woodward-Kron, L. S., Delany, R., Dodds, C., Lavercombe, A., Hughson, M. J (2018). Medical student clinical placements as sites of learning and contribution. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C., & Billett, S. (2017). Learning to prescribe through co-working: Junior doctors, pharmacists and consultants. Medical Education, 51(4), 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research and methods: Integrating theory and practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vleuten, C., Schuwirth, L., Driessen, E., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., et al. (2012). A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Medical Teacher, 34, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L., O’Brien, B., & Rees, C. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education, 51, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, L., Lo, K., & Maloney, S. (2018). What impact do students have on clinical educators and the way they practise? Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice, 23(3), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9785-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Interview data collection and analysis were performed by CK and LvH with support from CP, SK and JB. Document analysis was completed by CP and SK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CP and CK and all authors contributed to subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Palermo.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kemp, C., van Herwerden, L., Molloy, E. et al. How do students offer value to organisations through work integrated learning? A qualitative study using Social Exchange Theory. Adv in Health Sci Educ 26, 1075–1093 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10038-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10038-x

Keywords

Navigation