Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Educational technology: what it is and how it works

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This theoretical paper elucidates the nature of educational technology and, in the process, sheds light on a number of phenomena in educational systems, from the no-significant-difference phenomenon to the singular lack of replication in studies of educational technologies. Its central thesis is that we are not just users of technologies but coparticipants in them. Our participant roles may range from pressing power switches to designing digital learning systems to performing calculations in our heads. Some technologies may demand our participation only to enact fixed, predesigned orchestrations correctly. Other technologies leave gaps that we can or must fill with novel orchestrations, which we may perform more or less well. Most are a mix of the two, and the mix varies according to context, participant, and use. This participative orchestration is highly distributed: in educational systems, coparticipants include the learner, the teacher, and many others, from textbook authors to LMS programmers, as well as the tools and methods they use and create. From this perspective, all learners and teachers are educational technologists. The technologies of education are seen to be deeply, fundamentally, and irreducibly human, complex, situated and social in their constitution, their form, and their purpose, and as ungeneralizable in their effects as the choice of paintbrush is to the production of great art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews TM, Leonard MJ, Colgrove CA, Kalinowski ST (2011) Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE-Life Sci Educ 10(4):394–405. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, Whalley G (1997) Aristotle’s Poetics: translated and with a commentary by George Whalley (Whalley G, Trans.). McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves, Kindle. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin J, Brand S (1978) Soft-tech. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ (eds) (1989) The social construction of technological systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom BS (1984) The 2 sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ Res 13(6):4–16. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175554

  • Bloom H (2000) Global brain: the evolution of mass mind. Wiley, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden M (1995) Creativity and unpredictability. Stanford Human Revi 4(2):123–139. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=212171&CFID=34973622&CFTOKEN=46572978

  • Boyd GM (1996) Emancipative educational technology. Canadian J Educ Commun 25:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand S (1997) How buildings learn. Phoenix Illustrated, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand S (2008) The clock of the long now: time and responsibility. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Changizi M (2013) Harnessed: how language and music mimicked nature and transformed ape to man. BenBella Books, Dallas

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen P-SD, Lambert AD, Guidry KR (2010) Engaging online learners: the impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Comput Educ 54(4):1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A (2008) Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark RC, Mayer RE (2011) e-Learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning, 3rd edn. Pfeifer, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffield F, Moseley DVM, Ecclestone K, Hall E (2004) Learning styles and pedagogy: a systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley M (1987) Architect or bee? The human price of technology. The Hogarth Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel J, Kanwar A, Uvalić-Trumbić S (2009) Breaking higher education’s iron triangle: access, cost, and quality. Change Mag Higher Learn 41(2):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis B, Sumara DJ (2006) Complexity and education: inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyckere P, Kirschner PA, Hulshof CD (2015) Urban myths about learning and education. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Derribo MH, Howard K (2007) Advice about the use of learning styles: a major myth in education. J Coll Reading Learn 37:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1916) Democracy and education. Macmillan, New York. http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/projects/digitexts/dewey/d_e/contents.html. Accessed 21 May 2001

  • Dron J (2006) Any color you like, as long as it’s Blackboard®. In: Proceedings from E-Learn 2006, Hawaii

  • Dron J (2007) Control and constraint in e-learning: choosing when to choose. Idea Group International, Hershey. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-390-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dron J (2013) Soft is hard and hard is easy: learning technologies and social media. Form@re 13(1):32–43. Retrieved from http://www.fupress.net/index.php/formare/article/view/12613

  • Dron J, Anderson T (2014) Teaching crowds: learning & social media. AU Press, Athabasca. Retrieved from http://teachingcrowds.ca

  • Dubos R (1969) American Academy of Allergy 25th anniversary series: the spaceship earth. J Allergy 44(1):1–9

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin UM (1999) The real world of technology, kindle. House of Anansi Press, Concord

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin UM (2014) Ursula Franklin speaks: thoughts and afterthoughts. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (1972) Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch M (1994) Homo faber. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R, Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 67–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel AK, Polepeddi L (2019) Jill Watson: a virtual teaching assistant for online education. In: Dede C, Richards J, Saxberg B (eds). Routledge, New York, pp 120–143

  • Haraway D (2013) Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie J (2013) Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes C (2018) Cognitive gadgets: the cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntrods R, Dron J (2017) Engagement with robots: building a social, self-paced, online robotics course. Proc E-Learn World Conf E-Learn Corporate Government Healthcare Higher Educ 2017:365–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Husmann PR, O’Loughlin VD (2019) Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparities among undergraduate anatomy students’ study strategies, class performance, and reported VARK learning styles. Anat Sci Educ 12(1):6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (2008) Reinventing the sacred: a new view of science, reason and religion. Basic Books, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (2019) A world beyond physics: the emergence and evolution of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly K (2010) What technology wants (Kindly ed.). Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhana A (2014) What is educational technology? An Inquiry into the meaning, use, and reciprocity of technology. Canadian J Learn Technol 40(3). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/823/399

  • Laurillard D (1993) Rethinking University Teaching—a framework for the effective use of educational technology. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Makel MC, Plucker JA (2014) Facts are more important than novelty: replication in the education sciences. Educ Res 43(6):304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14545513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough EF, Kahn KB (1996) Using ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ technologies for global new product development. R&D Manag 26(3):241–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1996.tb00959.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan M, McLuhan E (1992) Laws of media: the new science. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Baki M (2013) The effectiveness of online and blended learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teach Coll Rec 115(3):1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore MG (1993) Theory of transactional distance. In: Keegan D (ed) Theoretical principles of distance education. Routledge, London, pp 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (1993) Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye DE (2006) Technology matters: questions to live with. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JK (2013) The purposes of schooling and the nature of technology: the end of education. In: Clough MP, Olson JK, Niederhauser DS (eds) The nature of technology. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 217–248

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, DeAngelis DL, Waide JB, Allen TFH (1986) A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Page SE (2011) Diversity and complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R (2008) Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychol Sci Public Interest 9(3):105–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Pei L, Wu H (2019) Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online 24(1):1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato, Jowett B (1993) Symposium and Phaedrus (Jowett B, Trans.). Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman N (2011) The end of education: redefining the value of school. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Read LE (1958) I, pencil. Imprimis 8(12):32–37. Retrieved from https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/I-PENCIL-My-Family-Tree-as-Told-to-June-1992.pdf

  • Rheingold H (2012) Mind amplifier: can our digital tools make us smarter? In: Kindle (ed) TED Books. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (2010) The rational optimist: how prosperity evolves. HarperCollins e-books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Riener C, Willingham D (2010) The myth of learning styles. Change Mag Higher Learn 42(5):32–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2010.503139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell TL (1999) The no significant difference phenomenon: as reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. North Carolina State University, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Saba F, Shearer RL (1994) Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. Am J Distance Educ 8(1):36–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamim RM, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Abrami PC, Schmid RF (2011) What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning. Rev Educ Res 81(1):4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Technology (n.d.). In: Oxford University Press, Oxford Dictionary of English. Retrieved 11 December, 2012, from http://www.oxfordreference.com

  • Turkle S, Papert S (1992) Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. J Math Behav 11(1):3–33. Retrieved from http://papert.org/articles/EpistemologicalPluralism.html

  • Williams WC (1969) The Wedge. In: Selected essays of William Carlos Williams. New Directions, NY, p 256

  • Wilson EO (2012) The social conquest of earth, Kindle. Liveright Pub. Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I give thanks to Terry Anderson and Gerald Ardito for their insightful feedback and suggestions to improve this work.

Funding

Athabasca University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science & Technology, Athabasca University, Athabasca, AB, Canada

    Jon Dron

Authors
  1. Jon Dron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Dron.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dron, J. Educational technology: what it is and how it works. AI & Soc 37, 155–166 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01195-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01195-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation